Sunday, 21 July 2013

The PESCI-THESES

In Italian PESCI means “fishes”. “Sette Pesci” (seven fishes) is a Southern-Italian dish representing the "Seven virtues". In geopolitical terms "P.E.S.C.I." comes to represent the opposite, a global disarray of seven plagues. So, what/who is PESCI ?

 

The geopolitical aftermath of the Berlin-Wall fall - an event that marked the end of the Cold-War era - meant a series of transformations in the international political society. One of these was the emerging of a Political-military Establishment Serving Corporate-business Interests, and of a trans-national character. This has to do with EU-democracies, for instance Sweden, in which the government's elite systematic indulges in decision-making favouring the interest of such supra-national constellation (PESCI), instead of preserving the national interests of the country and the integrity of its citizens.


Prominent right-wing leaders in different countries, now openly serve the interest of a corporate system which many of them also form part, as shareholders or board members. Traditional "class-struggle" is nowadays negated in most of world societies, after the formerly ideological confrontation between Capitalism and Socialism in the frame of the Cold War came to and end, abruptly. PESCI has also introduced fundamental changes in the culture and academic life of its country-members, not seen in the old "Imperialism" era. A most remarkable feature is that, globally considered, this "over-the-national-borders" identification of interest, class-ideology, and personal economic involvement of those in power, has NOT conveyed a reciprocal internationalism among organizations at grass-root level. These peoples are instead manipulated to pseudo-chauvinist positions, which avert popular control over their governments - de facto collaborating with a "foreign constellation of power". Main implementations in this collaboration taking place in Intelligence gathering, joint military operations, financing and banking, and protective legislation towards PESCI's economic interests.


The evolution of the environmental movement, and the replace of "class-struggle" for "Religion Faith" alleged international conflicts, or "gender confrontation" instead of gender-equality -- are issues also to be analyzed later in the Pesci Theses.

 

These world developments - and the vacuum left by traditional oppositional left-parties or "anti-imperialist" movements, suggest the need of uniting Libertarian, Let-Liberal, and Pirate-Party movements, and followers of the emergent Whistleblowing movement inspired by WikiLeaks, into a broad political Human-Rights front. This political effort should aim to enhance political awareness in a world society alienated by government-controlled social-networking and subliminal-implanted consumerism.

 

By Marcello Ferrada de Noli
[This material will be updated consecutively. Some texts found in twitter-format in appendix below]



x

Thesis I. The Berlin Wall geopolitical aftermath & end of Cold-War: PESCI as mutation of US Expansionism

The Berlin Wall geopolitical aftermath, which marked the end of the Cold-War era, gave a series of transformations in the international political society. One of these was the emerging of a trans-national Politic-military Establishment Serving INTERNATIONAL Corporate financial & business Interests. Prominent right-wing leaders in different countries to serve the interest of a corporate system they form part of. Traditional "class-struggle" nowadays  negated in most of world societies, as the formerly ideological confrontation between Capitalism and Socialism in the frame of the Cold War.
 
What is P.E.S.C.I.?

In Italian PESCI means “fishes”. “Sette Pesci” (7 fishes) is a Southern-Italian dish representing the "Seven virtues"

In geopolitical terms “P.E.S.C.I.” represent the opposite, like a global disarray of seven plagues. So, what/who is PESCI?

“P.E.S.C.I.” stands for “Political-military Establishment Serving Corporative Interests”. Further, PESCI is a global organization; not only residing in the US.

“Establishment” to include MSM (Main stream media) and military as well as civilian authorities, independent if “democratic” elected, co-opted or designated in a PESCI-designated coup



x

Thesis II. On the differences between PESCI and the traditional US Politic-Economic Expansionism

 

There are central differences between the concepts PESCI and so called ”US Imperialism”:

1) PESCI has a “multinational” leadership; ”national” interests ceased  to exist 
I.e., facts indicate that C Bildt’s ”Swedish” foreign policy (determining Sweden’s military strategy as well as Intelligence and military operations) is NOT inspired or implemented in the national interests of Sweden. Those foreign policy decisions made by Minister Bildt follows paramount PESCI interests, NATO’s interest.

Another example is the multinational cooperation in the production of Swedish weaponry (the ”Swedish” JAS attack plane, in fact a Swedish/UK/US joint venture).

2) a FINANCIAL PART of the corporative system

Another difference between “US Imperialism” and “PESCI” is that leaderships in the governments in the PESCI constellation are at the same time a FINANCIAL PART of the corporative system (the ultimate PESCI decision-power) that their local governments serve.

3) International Top-level coordination forums

Unlike traditional “US Imperialism”, with base in Washington (and Wall Street), where satellite local governments were kind of underpaid marionettes, PESCI has top-level coordination forums. See for instance the half-known Bildergerg Group.

4) The lame democratic and Union's opposition

Another difference. Under the current PESCI era, traditional “left” or “trade union” opposition has been rather lame, unlike it was during the anti-Imperialist movement of the 60-80’s.

We missed PESCI developing in front of our nose, while rather indulged on “global warming” discussions instead of focusing in the particularities of this financial-politic-military globalization.

Would this explain that several ”environmental” parties in EU turn showing (environment aside) they in fact support PESCI-pro legislations?



x

Thesis III. An emerging libertarian movement

 

So, would this anew emerging LIBERTARIAN fighting spirit evoked for instance by the deeds of WkiLekas, Assange, Manning and Snowden, rescue democracy?
Von Clausewitz said ”war is the continuation of politics”. But we have seen all across recent years that wars were rather the continuation of greed (PESCI’s greed).

Von Clausewitz true aphorism properly reads ”War is the continuation of Politik by Other means” (military). However, I would say a political movement can win a war, without an army, without military means.

The question being, is whistleblowing a movement? And if so, is it a political one?

In ”Historical meaning of WikiLeaks” I postulated that WL social support has been converted in political force.

A crucial political question is now what the whistleblowing movement would be aiming to achieve STRATEGICALLY:

Do they aim only to expose the system's wrong doings? Or criticize the system's political or economic fundaments? Or further, to try Changing the system?

Why would I talk on “whistleblowing movement” rather than on ”persons-whistleblowers”? For obviously a potential for effectual political change in a society could be (eventually) achieved insofar Whistleblower-episodes become a political movement. And with a social support, strong and active enough to be converted into a political force. Only after this political force is identified (as singular for the movement), can a political organization be established.

So, would this anew emerging LIBERTARIAN fighting spirit evoked for instance by the deeds of WkiLekas, Assange, Manning and Snowden, rescue democracy?

x

Thesis IV. On the Origins of State-Feminism in Sweden. Drastic changes in cultural and academics norms, and the re-establishment of pseudo-science in the PESCI era

 

[Excerpts from a previous analysis n Professorsblogg]
x
When the Cold War came to an end, the subsequent disintegration of the socialist bloc echoed heavily in Sweden. International balance was lost. The ruling politicians were tipped by gravity towards the only geopolitical end point that survived.
x
The Americanization of Swedish political culture developed fast and uncontested. Government became business. Social welfare became private monopoly. Millions of Swedes were suddenly detached from their secure social system, and the traditional left capitulated to the enemy without combat. It was then that their political struggle was replaced by the more comfortable (and profitable) gender confrontation. To hide their lack of ideological conviction, or combat spirit, the opportunistic left sold their lie to the public: Women, together with men, are not suffering because of a greedy system of profit – women are suffering because of men. And since the system is no longer the enemy, the system very much becomes the ally. Radical feminism became state feminism.
x
This was the beginning of the cultural and intellectual impoverishment of modern Sweden. Cultural programmes were replaced by alienating superficial pseudo-entertainment. Scientific empirical methods at Swedish universities were replaced by “qualitative research”, an easy, cheap, and “pseudo” method which consists of drawing “scientific” conclusions from interviews with a dozen people, women for the most part, who share their “impressions” to the interviewing “researcher”, a woman for the most part. True scientific research in Sweden dropped off ominously, as did the scholarly requirements placed on new researchers.[4]
x
Sound, medically verifiable clinical diagnoses were replaced by pseudo-clinical constructs such as “stress-induced”  frozen pelvis and “burnout” (“utbrändhet”) [5]. The latter served to give long-term “sick leaves” to hundreds of thousands of individuals, for the most part women. Sweden became the European nation with the highest incidence of mentally ill people, this according to international statistics for people on sick leave for “mental” diagnoses, to which psychological problems and the fashionable mental diagnosis “work stress” belonged. The “utbrändhet” diagnosis, later known as “utmattningssyndrom” reached an epidemic-like  distribution only in Sweden, all which comfirmed its cultural character [6].

Some years later, and as I predicted in “The emperor’s burn-out clothes” [7] it was demonstrated that a) while stress levels in society (and at the workplaces in particular) have not diminished at all in Sweden at the end of the 90′s (the stress level in society had rather increased, b) sick leaves “caused” by work-related psychological stress (“burnout”) , especially among Swedish women, have notably decreased and finally practically disappeared. Ergo, The purported causal correlation between “increasing work and societal stress” and “burnout (utbrändhet)” was demonstrated to be as fake as the fashion diagnoses [5] invented by researchers associated at that time to the Karolinska Institute.
x
The real winners became the Pharmaceutical industry [8] and the private “therapy clinics” often owned by the above researches themselves. However, in the scandalous promotion of such “burnout” diagnoses it was involved official Sweden, the social democratic government, feminists spoke persons, feminist journalists at the mainstream media [9], the feminist-controlled Swedish Psychiatric Association [10], and even the National Board of Health (Socialstyrelsen) [11]. All these brought shame to the country and contributed collectively to shake Sweden’s credibility in the international community.

x
The the new “qualitative research”
x
The forced retreat of the scientific method from its position of dominance in Swedish academia and research, and the productivity vacuum left behind, was rapidly filled by the new “qualitative research” method and the re-emergence of psychoanalytical categories.  None of these intellectual approaches would have been possible without the re-emerging, religion-inspired (religion-pretexted) Western confrontation with the Arab world.
x
The imperialistic seizing of oil resources in the Middle East, pretexted by the Kuwait and Iraq wars of the Bush dynasty, occasioned a political and at times tiny military response from sectors of the Arab societies made known to us – by edict of our governments – as the Islamic threat, a religious and belligerent fundamentalist movement aimed at the destruction of Western cultural institutions and their replacement with Islamic rule. Cultural racism made its entrance into Swedish politics.[12]
x
The new presence of religion as a factor in this cultural confrontation (“our religion contra their religion”) in turn made possible the renaissance of vintage non-scientific ideologies such as Freudianism. But while religious thought is conversation between people and their god, Freudianism is conversation between people and their navels. Freudians and religious activists share the idolatry of the subjective – “idealism” contra “materialism” as they vulgarly put it. Nevertheless, the scientific method is alien to both.
x
The pretentiously obsessive treatment of female sexuality in Sweden, the pretentiously exhibitionist need to vent intimate details of one’s life such as in the ‘talk about it’ campaign, the pretentious hero treatment of women who accuse men of rape in normal consensual circumstances, and so forth: this indicates either deviancy or despair. It’s the isolated individual without the support of a normal family, a normal friend, a normal system. It is the absence of the old feeling of “security” that neocapitalist Sweden did not replace.
x
During most of the last century, Swedish men and woman were educated in the solidarity of their state institutions, from where they found solutions to their societal problems. The Swedish system, not quite socialist, not quite capitalist, was a balance between West and East. When the Berlin Wall was torn down, so was the social welfare system in Sweden. Individuals became atoms without a social orbit and their reference point became themselves. Egoism had been reborn.
x
For the radical and state feminists, the choice of the “qualitative” approach ornamented by Freudian categories was not accidental but essential: the qualitative method was their one and only epistemological option. It is only with the use of an imposed “take it or leave it” faith-based, non-empirical method that feminism could make their master thesis of a “patriarchal” cause of all the misfortunes of women in society, starting with those of their own, prevail. No need to bother with empirical, rational replication – feelings (for the most part bitterness) are sufficient. Translated for the medical debate:
x
“In order to qualify as having a disease, it is not relevant whether symptoms are medically verifiable. What is relevant is the “experience”, what patients feel innermost, their own subjective notion of being ill”.[13]
x
Swedish women ceased to be individuals in the context of social equality. They were now “victims” instead. And they should be compensated for centuries, for thousands of years, of ferocious intellectual rape, structural violence and economic abuse by all men. For radical "feminism", gender equality ceased to be an option.
x
x
x
Notes and references
x
4. As an illustration: instead of the seven scientific articles required in old times by the Karolinska Institutet to obtain a doctorate degree, now it is enough with only one published article, one accepted, and two still in draft!

5. "Frozen pelvis" is instead a physical condition caused by infection or carcinoma. The Swedish version of "burnout" is called "utbrändhet or "utmattningssyndrom" (see Ref 6 below). The first public exposure of the pseudo-diagnose "utbrändhet" is found in my DN-debatt article "Utbrändhet, mest en modetrend", Dagens Nyheter, Stockholm, 2000-10-20

6. M. Ferrada-Noli "Utmattningssyndrom är en kulturellt betingad diagnos unik för Sverige". Dagens Medicin 2007-10-03.

7. M. Ferrada-Noli, "Kejsarens utbrända kläder". Sociologisk forskning. 2004-1 [1]

8. M. Ferrada-Noli. Om skandalen kring antidepressiva , Second-Opinion


Id.



Svenska Dagbladet

x


Appendix 1. Twitters by @professorsblogg 20-21 July 2013

x
Allow me some frank Libertarian messages to/about a System I have called "P.E.S.C.I."; starting next Twitter. #Assange #Manning #Snowden #WikiLeaks

What is P.E.S.C.I.? In Italian PESCI means “fishes”.“Sette Pesci” (7 fishes)is a Southern-Italian dish representing the 7 virtues

In geopolitical terms "P.E.S.C.I."represent the opposite, like a global disrray of seven plagues. So, what/who is PESCI ?

"P.E.S.C.I."stands 4 "Pol.militar Establishment Serving Corporate Interests". Further, PESCI is a global Org, not only in US

“Establishment” also includes MSM and satellit's  &military &civilian authorities, independent if “democratic” elected, co-opted or designated in a SYSTEM’s coup

#Assange #Manning #Snowden #WikiLeaks Please continue reading this Twitter series throug @professorsblogg because hashtags taking some space

There are central diffs. btwn the concepts PESCI &"US Imperialism":1) P has a "multinational" leadership;"national"interests ceased 2 exist 

I.e., facts indicate that C Bildt’s ”Swe” foreing pol (determining Swe milit strateg. &ops) NOT in Swe national interests,but P’s #Snowden

Another example is the multinational cooperation in the production of weaponry (the ”Swedish”JAS attack plane, in fact Swe/UK/US joint vent)

2) Other diff. btwn“US Imperialism” & “PESCI” is that govt leaderships are a FINANCIAL PART of the corporative system that their govts serve

IPESCI's  satellite govt's leaderships are a FINANCIAL PART of the corporatist system that their government serve
3)Unlike traditional“US Imperialism”,where localGovts were kind of  underpaid marionettes, PESCI has top-level coordination forums http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

4)Under the current PESCI era, traditional “left” or “trade union” opposition is rather lame, unlike it was during the anti-Imperialist mov.

We missed PESCI developing in front of our nose,while rather indulged on “global warming” tlk insteadOf financial-pol.military globalization

Would this explain that several ”environmental” parties in EU turn showing they (environment aside) in fact support PESCI-pro legislations?

So, would this anew emerged LIBERTARIAN fighting spirit evoked by the deeds of #Assange #Manning #Snowden #WikiLeaks rescue democracy?

PESCI, listen up: Von Clausewitz said, "war is the continuation of politics". But we have sees that all recent wars were the continuation of greed (yours)
x
Von Clausewitz true aphorism was"War is the continuation of Politik by other means"(military). I say a political movement can win a war, without an army
x
The question being, is whistleblowing a movement? And if so, is it a political one? #WikiLeaks #Assange #Snowden
x
In"Historical meaning of #WikiLeaks"I postulated that WL soc.support has been converted inPol.force http://professorsblogg.com/2011/12/26/historical-meaning-of-wikileaks-and-swedish-myths-on-julian-assange/ … #Snowden #Assange
x
Crucial pol. quest is now what the whistleblowing mov. would aim 2achieve STRATEGICALLY. 2Expose, criticize or tryCHANGE THE SYSTEM?#Snowden
x
Why “whistleblowing mov”instead"persons-whisteblowers"? Potential 4 pol change only insofar WhistlBlow-episodes become pol.movement


PESCI, listen up: These young people supporting #Assange #Manning& #Snowden, is the dream of a future Ideology; you are a nightmare of thePast

They are Unamuno; You are Franco’s Gral. Millán-Astray.They said"venceréis pero no convenceréis". You responded "Viva la muerte!"

You killed Che & Allende, & my best friends Miguel Enríquez http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Enr%C3%ADquez & Bautista, betrayed by a priest http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bautista_van_Schouwen_Vasey

You have killed your enemies as well as your friends, your soldiers. You make orphans & parents left 2 sorrow for life

You killed 58,209 & wounded 153,303 US soldiers in Vietnam; U silenced 2death 1 million Vietnamese. But U couldn't silence Vietnam #Manning

You killed 4,488 & wounded 32,222 Americans in Iraq, and took 190,000 Iraqi lives. And you did not silence Iraq

PESCI, you & C Bildt lied to us about "weapons of mass destruction"; where not instructions given to you by the Bilderberg Group?

You, PESCI, you are just after recruiting new Bilderberg Group's vassals.
You can trick young Swedes to shine in Facebook, your spying trap."Yes you can" feed them w/McDonald & Coke, but yourself do not drink that.

You instead drink the oil of my soil; you eat the child of my womb.You then send a helicopter, & U laugh while aiming your guns at my street
x
You kill journalists that are not blond. And hijab mothers, & innocent sons. You think you are your God, untraceable.

But ethics watches you. #Manning watched your killing; others watch the priest that blesses your Crimes.Thanks Brad,thanks sincerely #Assange

x
And thanks #WikiLeaks, and thanks all the good souls that enabled the production of “Collateral Murder” #Assange #Manning
x

Friday, 19 July 2013

Are whistleblowers celebrities?

In the context of a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, “whistleblowers are not interesting as persons; the essential issue is what they have achieved on behalf of an open democracy”

Swedish newspaper reports on nomination of Assange, Manning and Snowden for Nobel Peace Prize

On article/interview in the Swedish newspaper Ystadsallehanda, by journalist Urban Nilmander, 19 July 2013

An article in the Swedish newspaper Ystadsallehanda, by journalist Urban Nilmander [click on image below for full text on-line), reports on the rationale of my triple nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize of Mr Julian Assange, Mr Edward Snowden, and US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning.

After noting that the said nominations are about personalities I consider "important for world democracy", the article quotes the following from the interview I had with the newspaper:

In the context of a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, “whistleblowers are not interesting as persons; the essential issue is what they have achieved on behalf of an open democracy”

 

“Those in power need to be challenged”

 

The newspaper recognizes that I am fully entitled based on my qualifications to nominate persons or organizations for the Nobel Peace Prize, but the question is, why this particular tripel nomination?

“I am deep engaged in the issue of citizens’ relationship with those in power, and I think that what (the nominated) whistleblowers have achieved is exceptionally significant”, quotes the article.

Referring to the high information-value of the disclosures of whistleblowers, I said that their reporting can be as important as investigations or articles produced by “normal journalists”. However, “I call for more investigative reporting by newspapers in the MSM. Those in power need to be challenged”

 

Beyond the alleged case of Sweden vs. Assange

 

The Swedish newspaper Ystadsallehanda also reports on my appeal of asylum for Edward Snowden, and explained in the article excerpts of my statement Why Sweden should consider asylum to Edward Snowden:

A positive statement by the Swedish authorities on that Sweden would consider asylum for Mr Snowden, will help the world to better understand the real libertarian and independent spirit of the Swedish people – an aspect that has been sadly obscured in most recent years due to the abandonment by Swedish authorities of the traditional non-alignment stance of the nation. Also, it will help stimulate anew dialogue to resolve the issues at stake and that have thrown a shadow over our sovereignty, such as the management of the case against Mr Assange:

Beyond the alleged case of Sweden vs. Assange, or the alleged irregularities of the case, the issue for Sweden is ultimately the question of self-government. And the issue of whether Sweden can reassume – as many of us dearly wish – the world podium of No. 1 country in fairness and justice, in political beauty and respect for human rights to all.


 Ystadsallehanda on NPP 19-7-14 Part-1  

Thursday, 18 July 2013

Brief words on Whistleblowing, Authority and Alienation

I don’t fear the present because the future is free; for more truth shall be told, on how humanity became enslaved by Alienation

Alienation of a society's soul can be cured by the information of minds. Exposing the secrets of those in power on how they keep people lame

A Twitter series posted in @professorsblogg the afternoon of 18 July, linked tags #WikiLeaks, #Assange, #Manning, and #Snowden
By Marcello Ferrada-Noli
The most predictable whistleblower is time. Secrets on true facts are an illusion; time invincible
Whistleblowers' main deed today is the same than social-philosophers of the past: increased social-awareness & exposed "authority" fraud
The enemy of Alienation is Social-consciousness, the political awareness on the relationships between power and nation, authority and democracy
Authority has power, but no right. People have right & authority. Liberating secrets kept by those in power against the people is Democracy
Those liberating secrets on behalf of people, give that people freedom of choice. They are no criminals; they are freedom fighters
I despise peoples’ usurpers called State, & democracy’s frauds called government. For they were elected to serve, not to lie; To protect & Not to kill
I don’t fear the trolls’ threats for I know they are heartless. / I defend whistleblowers’ human rights
I don’t fear nameless’ threats for their faces are recognizable. / I defend whistleblowers’ Human rights
I don’t hide for mercenaries; for truth is a whip slashing harder on the open. / I defend whistleblowers’ human rights
I don’t fear their bosses, for are they who fear us. / I defend whistleblowers’ human rights
I don’t fear the drone, because it cannot write. It can kill, but not survive. / I defend whistleblowers’ human rights
I win even if dead. You lose even if breathe. / I defend whistleblowers’ human rights | Truth is invincible
I don’t fear the present because the future is free, for more truth shall be told, on how humanity became enslaved by Alienation
Alienation of a society's soul can be cured by the information of minds. Exposing the secrets of those in power on how they keep people lame
Replace what Marx said on Religion, & Alienation "is the oppressed creature's cry; the spirit of an epoch deprived of spirit; it is ppl's opium"
A most terrible crime is the one against integrity. Spying on an entire nation is ethical genocide
Spying on its own nation, all citizens alike, is a political-psychiatric diagnosis: State paranoia
Spying on the whole world, including its own nation, is a political-psychiatric disease: fascism; pure & simple
When I say, "I defend WikiLeaks” I mean the right to whistleblowing 4 giving back 2 ppl what belongs 2 ppl: the information kept on their own
 
x
Citizens Journalist Exchange

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

I have nominated Julian Assange, Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden for the Nobel Peace Prize

I assert that the public access of the disclosed documents “has helped to promote human rights, democracy and freedom of speech.”

 

medal_AnolbelP 
In the reverse of the Nobel Peace Prize medal, its reads the inscription
"For peace and fraternity"
x

In recent days I have published an appeal regarding  Why Sweden should consider asylum to Edward Snowden
I have also heard about the nomination of Edward Snowden done by professor colleague Stefan Svallfors, of the University of Umeå. I have tried to get in contact with Prof. Svallfors. I wished to suggest colleague Svallfors the inclusion of Mr Julian Assange and US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning in the nomination he submitted to the Peace Nobel Prize Committee.

x
In recent days I have published an appeal regarding  Why Sweden should consider asylum to Edward Snowden.
 
I have also heard about the nomination of Edward Snowden done by professor colleague Stefan Svallfors, of the University of Umeå. I have tried to get in contact with Prof. Svallfors. I wished to suggest colleague Svallfors the inclusion of Mr Julian Assange and US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning in the nomination he submitted to the Peace Nobel Prize Committee.

After careful consideration, I have decided to make a direct presentation to the Nobel Committee in Oslo, and which I have submitted today 16 of July, 2013. See the communication to the Nobel Committee down below [Click for enlarged text]. Nomination Submitted according to the guidelines at Nomination and Selection of Peace Prize Laureates, which would qualify me as nominator according to Item No 3 below.


x
qualified nominators

submission doc.
x
x
NP

Sunday, 14 July 2013

Swedish Liberal Party at Kalmar requesting asylum for Edward Snowden. Interview in Professors Blogg

Björn Brändewall: "Based on a 1989 ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and on article 19, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 'No one may be removed, expelled or extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'"

 



Björn Brändewall: “Based on a 1989 ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and on article 19, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, ‘No one may be removed, expelled or extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ “

Mr Björn Brändewall is a MP candidate of the Swedish Liberal Party (Folkpartiet), currently member of the leading board of the Liberal Party in the “Kalmar Län”, Sweden [Coat of arms of the Kalmar Län at left. Län are the first level administrative and political subdivisions of Sweden, equivalent to “region” in Italy or the “state” in the U.S.]. The Swedish Liberal Party (Liberal People’s Party of Sweden, in Swedish Folkpartiet liberalerna, FP) forms part of the center-right coalition of the current government of Sweden. It is the second largest party in the government coalition.
251px-Kalmar_län_vapen.svg 
The Swedish Liberal Party at Kalmar sent recently a request to the national leadership of the said party, to consider the asylum for Mr Edward Snowden. The missive was signed by the Chairman of the Swedish Liberal Party in Kalmar, Mr Börje Helgesson [picture down at right]. Mr Helgesson, together with Mr Brändewall [picture down-left], also wrote an opinion article in Barometern headed “Liberal Party wants to give asylum to Snowden“. 

Declarations of the initiative’s authors have been published in the official site of the Liberal Party of Sweden; the text is visualized in the screenshot, down below this text.

For instance, Mr Brändewall declares, “Edward Snowden fears for his life. He does not regret anything, but he he knows what he can expect if the U.S. [authorities] manage to get hold of him. His only crime was to tell the American people what their government is up to. For that he has not only given up his career, but he is also risking his life”.

Brändewall continues, “In the information age, information is power. For individuals to have power over their lives, they must also have power over their information. However, our worst fears of a surveillance society have become true, and others end up with that power”, says Björn Brändewall.
 
For his part, the Chairrman of the Kalmar Liberals Börje Helgesson states that “the Swedish Liberal Party has been engaged during many years to make Sweden a refuge for persecuted authors working in countries with restricted freedom of expression”. He also hopes that their proposal of asylum for Mr Snowden will be treated at government level.

Professors blogg’s questions to Mr Brändewall


I asked Mr Brändewall for an interview in Professors blogg, which he kindly accepted. Here below his answers.
B Brändewall 
Professors blogg: Thinking that an indictment against Mr Snowden might comprise the possibility of death penalty, what kind of reassurances do you think it could be obtained from the authorities (Government or Immigration authorities) on that Snowden will not be send to the US in case his extradition is requested?

Björn Brändewall: “Based on a 1989 ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and on article 19, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, ‘No one may be removed, expelled or extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’.”

He continues, “This strongly appears to be the case with Snowden and the USA. It should be noted that Sweden has failed to live up to this before, when the Social Democratic government at the request of CIA turned over two Egyptian citizens to Egypt in 2001, where they were tortured. However, this became a big scandal, and the current centre-right government in Sweden ought to be hard pressed not to repeat the mistake of their old rival, the Social Democrats.”

Professors blogg: What level of response (mainly positive or mainly negative?), has your proposal have got among your peers in the Liberal Party or among the young liberals?
Börje 
Björn Brändewall: “Responses from Liberal Party peers have so far been fairly sparse, but what we have received has been mainly positive. I realize that when it comes to issues that affect diplomatic relations, people in high power may have many reasons not to give public statements too quickly. Still, I hope the media attention that our proposal has gathered will speed this up.”

Professors blogg: Has the Liberal Party’s national leadership already scheduled the discussion of the proposal done by the Liberals at Kalmar Region?

Björn Brändewall: “Not that we know of. We at the Liberal Party in the Kalmar Region [Folkpartiet Kalmar län] intend to follow-up on this though, as we feel this matter needs to be handled urgently.”

On other issues – contained in an addenda to this interview Mr Björn Brändewall sent to Professors blogg – Mr Brändewall also expressed his concern about an eventually magnified focus on the person of Snowden. That might shadow, according to his opinion, the real issues at stake as revealed “in the news about the NSA surveillance”. In his words:

”I am concerned that the media are devoting so much focus on Edward Snowden personally. Snowden’s fate will be decided sooner or later, and when that happens I am afraid that news will die out, including the news of the NSA surveillance. We need to shift the debate to be more about NSA and PRISM, and American politicians, so they don’t get away with this.”
x
——
Advocating in benefit of a Swedish asylum for whistleblower Edward Snowden, it is a human-rights goal that Mr Björn Brändewall, Mr Börje Helgesson and Professors blogg share sincerely. I.e.,  Why Sweden should consider asylum to Edward Snowden, by Marcello Ferrada-Noli.

Professors blogg also struggle for the human-rights of all whistleblowers risking their lives, including the right to asylum for Mr Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks


x
folkpartiet - snowden

Saturday, 13 July 2013

Why Sweden should consider asylum to Edward Snowden

A positive statement by the Swedish authorities on that Sweden would consider asylum for Mr Snowden, will help the world to better understand the real libertarian and independent spirit of the Swedish people – an aspect that has been sadly obscured in most recent years due to the abandonment by Swedish authorities of the traditional non-aligned stance of the nation. Also, it will help stimulate anew dialogue to resolve the issues at stake and that have thrown a shadow over our sovereignty, such as the management of the case against Mr Assange. 

 

Beyond the alleged case of Sweden vs. Assange, or the alleged irregularities of the case, the issue for Sweden is ultimately the question of self-government and of whether Sweden can reassume – as many of us dearly wish – the world podium of No. 1 country in fairness and justice, in political beauty and respect for human rights to all.

 

By Marcello Ferrada-Noli

Introduction
The travel-document argument
The shortest distance and secure-route argument
Possible arguments against my proposal
A Swedish asylum for Snowden in the context of the Assange case



Introduction

 

World opinion is already on the side of Mr Edward Snowden, who is currently a refugee in an International airport, deprived of his national passport, and due to exposing massive spying by the U.S. on friend and foe alike. I understand that one of the problems faced by Mr Snowden - in case he would try to implement the asylum granted by Venezuela - is the need of a travel-document. Another reported problem would be the long and allegedly insecure route. Further, if Mr Snowden would be unable to take up asylum in Latin America, and thus forced to accept asylum in Russia, he will be bound of not declaring any thing that could be considered detrimental, as “to harm” the U.S. Certainly, Mr Snowden's endeavour has never been “to harm” his country intentionally. He just exposed the fashion in which - in my opinion - the U.S. government it does harm the privacy and personal integrity of the core of his country - the citizens. Not to mention EU, Asia and Latin-American institutions and peoples, who have also been treated as enemies via this massive indiscriminate spying. Nevertheless, the question is also, is the shelter offered by Russia worth the cost- being banned from revealing further information?

When Sweden gave me political asylum after my revelations at the Russell Tribunal on Latin America in Rome 1974, they never put any condition on that I would have to promise stop the whistleblowing on Pinochet's Junta or about the aggravating role of the U.S. in the military coup.

As discussed below, stateless refugees have the right to the Alien’s passport that can be issued by any country signatory of the 1954 Geneva Convention (1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons). I have learned, however, that Venezuela is not a signatory of such document. But Sweden is. Secondly, The considerably shorter route between Russia and Sweden also makes that option immediately attractive.

Stateless_Persons_Convention
States parties and signatories to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons. States parties are dark blue; non-states parties signatories are light blue; non-state parties non-signatories are grey (Wikimedia Commons)
 
Sweden has a notable tradition – in fact historical - in providing asylum for political and/or humanitarian reasons from the 60´s and onwards. Unfortunate episodes in which some officials, at some politician’s orders, have done otherwise, should not supplant facts at large. For instance, during the Vietnam-War era, Sweden was a refuge for American “vapenvägrare [conscientious objectors]” (a fact which is not well known by younger generations outside Sweden); the list of historical episodes in which Swedish diplomats have, at the highest personal risk, helped political dissidents or ethnic-persecuted peoples and brought them into Swedish territory is also notable. The most well known examples are, of course, those of R. Wallenberg and, more recently, Ambassador Edelstam in Chile.

This appeal is totally personal, of my own initiative, and has no bound to any organization or individuals engaged internationally in their noble struggle for asylum of Mr Snowden. My expectations declared here are based solely in my experience as political refugee in Sweden.
X

The travel-document argument

 

One main problem that Mr Snowden is having, as I have understood, is that a) he has partly been deprived of his U.S. passport, and b) the safe-conduct (transit-pass) issued by the Consul of Ecuador in London is not any longer valid. This below is based in my Swedish experience.

I remember vividly when the Pinochet government revoked my constitutional right of renewing my passport, making me stateless, after my testimony at the Russel Tribunal in Rome 1974 exposing the killings, torture and horrible crimes perpetrated by the Junta in the Prisoners Camp in which I have been confined.  Helped by lawyer Hans Göran Frank (one of the founders of Amnesty International Sweden), I obtained political asylum and a främnlingpass (alien’s passport) according to the Geneva-Convention in a matter of weeks. While researching in this case, I saw that the Immigration authority is now providing extensive information about this possibility (here explained in English).

Unlike many other countries, for instance countries of Latin America, Sweden has not made it (in absolute terms) compulsory for the refugee applying for asylum to produce travel documents at the border. A proof of this irregularity is the significant category “papperlösa” [paperless] amongst the immigrants or refugees in Sweden. Here we have also to distinguish between the possession of travel-documents (such as a national passport, or Geneva-Convention aliens’ passport - främling pass), and the understandable need of verifying the individual’s identity. In this sense, the situation for Mr Snowden is quite more favourable (he does not have travel papers but his identity is fully verifiable).

fr-pass
So it looked the cover of my Alien's passport - for "stateless" refugees, as now Mr Snowden
 
Sweden, and I understand all countries that signatories of the 1954 Geneva Convention, can issue the so called alien’s passport, and by which the refugee that holds it may travel to all countries except his/her country of origin. As a matter of fact, I used such a travel document to enter the U.S. in 1977 in occasion of a meeting with my father, then in Washington.
X 

The shortest distance & secure-route argument

 

There is also the logistics dimension of the problem, in the context of alleged perils of a long flight across Europa and the Atlantic. Even if Snowden would like to implement any asylum proposition from Latin America, for instance of Venezuela, the problem of transportation remains.
Besides, Snowden is reportedly to have declared that he settles now for asylum in Russia only because he ”could not fly to Latin America”. This problem is solved if travel will be done to “neighbouring” Sweden. Geographic realities are obvious in this line of reasoning.
X 

Possible arguments against my proposal

 

I am also prepared to meet some opposition or criticism about this proposal among supporters of Mr Snowden. I could anticipate that one argument against the proposal is that some Swedish officials and politicians have demonstrated in the past years (since the times of former Justice Minister Thomas Bodström and onwards) a collaborationist stance towards the U.S., including the implementation of Intelligence agreements and operations. Thus, “they will work to give Snowden away”.

I have myself criticized that collaborationist stance in my columns and have argued (I still do) for a returning to a geopolitical stand of non-alignment and non-intervention. I am convinced that geopolitical Neutrality, together with reliance in our own, independent military might, best service Sweden’s national security interests. Also, a Neutral Sweden can best serves the world at large, as it was during the times in which Sweden’s mediation in complex international conflicts served world peace. That task enhanced and maintained the international stature of Sweden.  Thus, although a “non-alignment doctrine” would mean non-intervention in military terms, it would also mean political and diplomatic intervention to the highest degree.

However, Mr Snowden has declared himself that his intentions are not to harm the U.S.; neither does he believe his leaks harm the US.

On the other hand, the possibilities that some amongst the most eager or passionate “Pro-U.S.” politicians would advocate for the extradition or ousting of Mr Snowden would be still there and it is not likely they will disappear completely from the debate. Neither would that stance disappear in Ecuador or Venezuela, for that part, in case Mr Snowden ends there. Sweden is unlikely to allow extradition to the US if the death penalty is involved, as that would violate Swedish law. The average Swede, the one electing the average politician, does indeed consider Snowden a whistle-blower and in Sweden we have the Swedish protective-legislation on whistleblowers-related behaviour. And for those argueing that Swedes are prone to follow U.S. fashions, well, in this case it would be positive if true: It  is already known that the majority of Americans, according to recent poll, do consider Snowden a whistleblower and not, as has been asserted by the U.S. government and associated news media, a “spy” or "traitor". And, in the context of this appeal, most revealing is one U.S. News poll on whether Foreign countries should provide asylum to  Mr Snowden.  See  update below.

Pol snowden 14 July 2013
U.S. News poll, update 14 July 2013

Further, in my opinion, the general opinion in Sweden is that Snowden is a whistle-blower. Then we have the Swedish protective-legislation on whistleblowers-related behaviour. And for those, with right, argumenting that Swedes may be prone to follow U.S. fashions, well, in this case it would be positive if true: It  is already known in Sweden that the majority of Americans (according to recent poll) do consider Snowden as a whistleblower and not, as has been asserted by the U.S. government and associated news media, a “spy”.
Sweden could become –attending to the present circumstances – a good possibility of asylum for Edward Snowden.
X 

A Swedish asylum for Snowden in the context of the Assange case

 

With regard to the "case Assange", the international position of Sweden has suffered due to a two-fold stance. On the one hand, because of the treatment given to the legal case, and secondly due to the public stance of some high-profile Swedish politicians and journalists have taken on the person of Assange.

On the other hand, this "case" has evolved parallel to an increasing openly alignment by Sweden with U.S. interests, not only militarily and at geopolitical levels, but also in matters of information-sharing, intelligence cooperation and protection of American industrial businesses and copyrights. Some of these themes, such as free information, are part of the main profile of WikiLeaks.

From an international perspective - Swedish authorities seem to be unwilling to end the case (for instance by interrogating Assange in London) and are insisting an extradition to Sweden despite other reasonable options. I have gone into this in detail in several articles in my blog. This situation around the case against the WikiLeaks founder – even considering that the allegations in Sweden are not formally related to Assange’s anti-secret organization, become over time more complicated and the impasse harder to deal with – for all concerned.

I accept that others may disagree with this assessment of Sweden’s case against Assange. However, the above summary might be a fair description of how the international community broadly –at least in social media – perceives the situation. Right or wrong factually, it is in any case a sad situation for Sweden, because it does not do justice to the tradition of Sweden as both a sovereign, neutral, independent, and loving-peace nation. I firmly believe that this - to declare openness towards the whistleblower's asylum - is also an opportunity for Sweden.

Finally.  I believe I know the Swedish domestic panorama fairly well. That is why I dare to go on with this proposal - against the known odds. For although I have Italian ancestry, or I live in Italy, I am in fact myself a Geneva-Convention political refugee from Chile, and I became a Swedish national 1979. I am one of the founders of MIR and as both a militant in the Chilean resistance against Pinochet and a prisoner in the Stadium and Quiriquina Island Prisoners Camp, I have borne witness to the earnest solidarity, and audacity, of previous Swedish governments and their envoys.

Thus, I dare to recall that honourable Swedish tradition and ask all Swedish political parties to endorse a proposition of asylum for Mr Edward Snowden. As Mr Björn Brändewall, from the Liberal Party in Kalmar put it recently, the revelations of Mr Snowden show that an American government agency spies on its own people in violation of the country's Constitution" ["Snowdens avslöjanden pekar på att en amerikansk myndighet spionerar på det egna folket i strid med landets konstitution", Fria människör hittar lösningar, 8/7-2013].
---
Selected pingbacks

Sweden — Paradise Lost, a continuing tragedy

By Kevin Townsned. July 14, 2013
When I was a child of the sixties Sweden enjoyed a worldwide reputation for freedom and liberalism. This was confirmed in the ’70s when Sweden gave asylum to Marcello Ferrada-Noli. In his own words,
I remember vividly when the Pinochet government revoked my constitutional right of renewing my passport, making me stateless, after my testimony at the Russel Tribunal in Rome 1974 exposing the killings, torture and horrible crimes perpetrated by the Junta in the Prisoners Camp in which I have been confined. Helped by lawyer Hans Göran Frank (one of the founders of Amnesty International Sweden), I obtained political asylum and a främnlingpass (alien’s passport) according to the Geneva-Convention in a matter of weeks. Why Sweden should consider asylum to Edward Snowden
Ferrada-Noli is now calling on Sweden to reaffirm that old reputation largely lost in recent years through the increasingly open “alignment by Sweden with U.S. interests, not only militarily and at geopolitical levels, but also in matters of information-sharing, intelligence cooperation and protection of American industrial businesses and copyrights.”

Sweden, as we now know from Edward Snowden, is effectively the ‘sixth eye’; part of the global Echelon/Five Eyes surveillance system operated by the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Sweden’s role is to monitor Russian internet traffic for the NSA.

Sweden’s new status is further confirmed by the country’s treatment of the Assange ‘rape’ case — there is absolutely no legal or logical reason why Assange could not be questioned in the Ecuador embassy in London. The only explanation can be Sweden’s determination to get Assange onto Swedish soil from where he can be shipped to the US for trial.

Ferrada-Noli believes that Sweden could regain its old liberal position by now offering Snowden asylum in the same way it was granted him many years ago. It’s a lovely thought. I believe that the Swedish people would welcome Snowden. But like so many ‘western’ countries, behind the facade of democracy, governments no longer reflect the people.

It will never happen. In fact it must not happen — not while Carl Bildt has a breath in his body

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Venezuela answers to U.S. pressures received on Snowden asylum

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Elías Jaua:

Jaua

"The Government of the United States, and the Department of State, should know that we have learned, since long time ago, and we have defeated pressures from anywhere in the world."

"We are going to act, as stated by President Nicolas Maduro, according to international law, and according to our principles. Venezuela has a tradition of providing refuge, shelter, to the political persecuted."

"We just cannot leave alone a young man that dared to mark an ethical and moral stance regarding an absolutely shameful fact, which is that one country controls the whole world"

 

By Marcello Ferrada-Noli

In order to stop further exposures by Edward Snowden, principally on the extension that the US agencies spy on the whereabouts and lives of ordinary U.S. citizens, and also abroad, the Obama administration “needs” to criminalize Snowden ethical behaviour.

The cannot acknowledge that Edward Snowden, as in the case of Julian Assange or Brad Manning, are to the highest degree ethically-minded individuals in pursuing disclosures about central, aggravating deeds, committed against the people. That they have been engaged in a social information enterprise solely directed at expose what is criminal from the part of those in power has to be concealed at any price.

That is the reason why whistle-blowers are called instead “spies”, and their ethical behaviour is criminalized by the magic of that label. Then, the distance from “spies” to “traitors” is just the one from a finger to the Enter-key in a keyboard.

The powerful empire of ancient times, the Catholic Church administrated by corrupted popes, had exactly such behaviour against those exposing the nature of their deceiving. Scientists, particularly in the profession of medicine (for instance those who denounced the pogrom of Jews that the popes ordered “to eradicate cholera-pests”), were labelled as heretic or demons serving Satan. And executed as traitors, or witches.

The Venezuela government has offered asylum to Mr Snowdon, as other Latin-American countries such as Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua, etc. have done it.
Under the pretext they are persecuting a criminal, a traitor of the national interests of the U.S., the Obama administration has exercised recently blunt threats and pressures against the government of Venezuela.

This is what Venezuelan Foreign Minister replied to such pressures [translation to English below the Spanish text]:

elias

En primer lugar nosotros sabemos que hay muchas presiones, el mundo, no? Nosotros hemos recibido dos notas del gobierno de los Estados Unidos, algunas llamadas de funcionarios del departamento de Estado.

EL Departamento de Estado y el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos, deben saber que desde hace mucho tiempo nosotros aprendimos, y derrotamos las presiones de cualquier parte del mundo.

Nosotros vamos a actuar, como lo ha dicho el presidente Nicolás Maduro, de acuerdo a la legalidad internacional, y de acuerdo a nuestros principios.

Venezuela tiene una tradición de refugio, de cobijo, a los perseguidos políticos.
First, we know that there are many (such) pressures, in the world, no? We have received two notes of the government of the United States, (and) some calls from officials at the State Department.

The Government of the United States, and the Department of State, should know that we have learned, since long time ago, and we have defeated pressures from anywhere in the world.

We are going to act, as stated by President Nicolas Maduro, according to international law, and according to our principles. Venezuela has a tradition of providing refuge, shelter, to the political persecuted.

In another, extended edition of the same interview, Minister Eias Jaua declared:

"We just cannot leave alone a young man that dared to mark an ethical and moral stance regarding an absolutely shameful fact, which is that one country controls the whole world" [No podemos dejar solo a un joven que se atrevió a fijar una posición ética y moral frente a un hecho que es absolutamente bochornoso, y que es que un gobierno controle a todo el mundo]